MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: iwl4965 on Compaq 8510p wireless speed very low, unusable
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 15:34:01 -0800
Message-ID: <D936D925018D154694D8A362EEB0892003D751F6@orsmsx416.amr.corp.intel.com> (sfid-20080306_233655_576314_88C8A4B6)
In-Reply-To: <c4aed99f0803061452v59ccfbf9y40782856c45f7560@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c4aed99f0803061220y40628cdxc8c2a4a0d2cac89f@mail.gmail.com> <D936D925018D154694D8A362EEB0892003D74F74@orsmsx416.amr.corp.intel.com> <c4aed99f0803061452v59ccfbf9y40782856c45f7560@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: "Chris Hallinan" <challinan@gmail.com>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Thursday, March 06, 2008 2:53 PM, Chris Hallinan  wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Chatre, Reinette
> <reinette.chatre@intel.com> wrote:
>> On , Chris Hallinan  wrote:
>> 
>>  >
>>  > After a couple days of searching (Google, bughost, etc) I've
>>  noticed > others with similar problems, but never came across a
>>  resolution.  Bug > 1481 is similar, though not exact.  Performance
>> is acceptable under  > WinXP (400KB+) 
>> 
>>  Please add information about your environment and test results to
>>  bug 1481 if you think it is appropriate - otherwise, please do
>>  submit a new bug to enable us to track it.
> 
> Bug 1623 has been submitted.
> 
> In the mean time, is there anything I can do help isolate?
> 

Can you compare the bandwidth you get with and without encryption? The
amount of data transmitted when using encryption is significantly more
than without ... comparing these two numbers may show something.

Reinette