Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:13129 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752590AbYCRAIK (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:08:10 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so8075746pyb.10 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43e72e890803171708s3361e1bbxa949cfa27086c31f@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080318_000816_170211_1E5C5AA5) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:08:08 -0400 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units Cc: "bruno randolf" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, flamingice@sourmilk.net, jbenc@suse.cz, jirislaby@gmail.com, mickflemm@gmail.com, "Johannes Berg" In-Reply-To: <1205094875.6387.48.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <200803082101.24424.bruno@thinktube.com> <1205094875.6387.48.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 21:01 +0900, bruno randolf wrote: > > RFC: trying to clean up the signal/noise mess - what do you think? > > (yep, my mailer probably messed up the linebreaks) > > > > mac80211: use hardware flags for signal/noise units > > No real opinion right now, on skiing vacation ;) Looks like an > improvement though. I believe this counts as an ACK :) Not sure if this applies yet but it sure would be nice to get this in. Luis