Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:48018 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754416AbYCaScn (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:32:43 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JgOoA-0008EL-MW for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:32:38 +0000 Received: from pro75-5-88-162-203-35.fbx.proxad.net ([88.162.203.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:32:38 +0000 Received: from tobutaz+kernel by pro75-5-88-162-203-35.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:32:38 +0000 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: TK Subject: Re: 2.6.24 panic in rt2x00lib_txdone / ieee80211_tx_status_irqsafe Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 18:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: (sfid-20080331_193246_955285_B958E6C9) References: <200803282034.56042.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:45:31 +0000, TK said: > On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:26:44 +0000, TK said: > >> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:34:55 +0100, Ivo van Doorn said: >> >>> The wireless-testing would be the most interesting since several race >>> conditions in the queues where fixed in there. Great, I wasn't able to trigger the crash again. I expect there is no chance of a backport though - 2.6.25 doesn't play nice with my distro, yet.