Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:4656 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754372AbYCGUDd (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:03:33 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:34:29 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Michael Buesch Cc: Vladimir Koutny , Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24, mac80211 and b/g switching Message-ID: <20080307193429.GA5561@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080307_200336_669157_CB067E05) References: <47D160E4.3040503@work.ksp.sk> <1204909966.6387.31.camel@johannes.berg> <47D17EDF.4010100@work.ksp.sk> <200803071916.28776.mb@bu3sch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200803071916.28776.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:16:28PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Friday 07 March 2008 18:43:59 Vladimir Koutny wrote: > > Do you think that taking mac80211 from wireless-2.6 (or -testing or > > whatever) would cause way too many conflicts when merged back to 2.6.24? > > Or am I on my own to fix this somehow in 2.6.24? > > OpenWRT ported a rather recent mac80211 back to 2.6.23. So it shouldn't be too hard. Current 2.6.24-based Fedora kernels take current mac80211 bits fairly easily. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com