Return-path: Received: from mgw1.diku.dk ([130.225.96.91]:37555 "EHLO mgw1.diku.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843AbYCEIz7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Mar 2008 03:55:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:55:49 +0100 (CET) From: Julia Lawall To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Christopher Li , yi.zhu@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Harvey Harrison , Alexander Viro , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-4965.c: Correct use of ! and & In-Reply-To: <20080305070201.GA32434@elte.hu> Message-ID: (sfid-20080305_085609_607150_5CE4DB10) References: <20080305063842.GA24495@elte.hu> <70318cbf0803042249j57d7f3a3j7666961a9132b10b@mail.gmail.com> <20080305070201.GA32434@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: There are some legitimate uses of !x & y which are actually of the form !x & !y, where x and y are function calls. That is a not particularly elegant way of getting both x and y to be evaluated and then combining the results using "and". If such code is considered acceptable, then perhaps the sparse patch should be more complicated. julia > Al's patch is: > > + if (op == '&' && expr->left->type == EXPR_PREOP && > + expr->left->op == '!') > + warning(expr->pos, "dubious: !x & y"); > > i think there might be similar patterns: "x & !y", "!x | y", "x | !y" ? > > Ingo >