Return-path: Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:43722 "EHLO out1.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754481AbYCUMhO (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:37:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:37:08 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Stefan Richter Cc: Andrew Morton , David Brownell , Richard Purdie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Geert Uytterhoeven , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, video4linux-list@redhat.com, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org Subject: Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c Message-ID: <20080321123708.GE5586@khazad-dum.debian.net> (sfid-20080321_123720_305766_4C338C7B) References: <20080316184349.GA28543@khazad-dum.debian.net> <200803161246.23909.david-b@pacbell.net> <20080318001429.896acf51.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080320225612.GB20788@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080320164741.734e838c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20080321003604.GC20788@khazad-dum.debian.net> <20080320180802.426ad2d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47E37E04.3080303@s5r6.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <47E37E04.3080303@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Stefan Richter wrote: > and eth1394 to deal with temporary lack of of tlabels. Alas I just > recently received a report that eth1394's workaround is unsuccessful on > non-preemptible uniprocessor kernels. I suspect the same issue exists Which, I think, is exactly the config where in_atomic() can't be used to mean "in_scheduleable_context()" ? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh