Return-path: Received: from vs166246.vserver.de ([62.75.166.246]:51729 "EHLO vs166246.vserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755411AbYCGSRE (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 13:17:04 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: Vladimir Koutny Subject: Re: 2.6.24, mac80211 and b/g switching Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 19:16:28 +0100 Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <47D160E4.3040503@work.ksp.sk> <1204909966.6387.31.camel@johannes.berg> <47D17EDF.4010100@work.ksp.sk> In-Reply-To: <47D17EDF.4010100@work.ksp.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200803071916.28776.mb@bu3sch.de> (sfid-20080307_181709_157350_9EFB1831) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 07 March 2008 18:43:59 Vladimir Koutny wrote: > Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Is this a known issue? (I didn't manage to find anything in ml archives > >> so far) Or any hints on how to solve this? > > > > You want to develop against a non-ancient kernel that has all the HW > > mode foo removed. > > Well, the question is not what version I would like to develop for, but > what version I have to :( Stable kernel releases should be those > versions you want to base real products on, right? > > Do you think that taking mac80211 from wireless-2.6 (or -testing or > whatever) would cause way too many conflicts when merged back to 2.6.24? > Or am I on my own to fix this somehow in 2.6.24? OpenWRT ported a rather recent mac80211 back to 2.6.23. So it shouldn't be too hard. -- Greetings Michael.