Return-path: Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.236]:32685 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755806AbYDWBQm (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:16:42 -0400 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so2039968wxd.4 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 11h IE conflicts with 11s From: Luis Carlos Cobo To: Tomas Winkler Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless , "John W. Linville" , Javier Cardona , bdm@fenrir.org.uk In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240804221723l51b8c9a1qa301ededf6c11336@mail.gmail.com> References: <1ba2fa240804221003o25515740r71c3210d3c9ffb91@mail.gmail.com> <1208885207.31429.43.camel@johannes.berg> <1ba2fa240804221723l51b8c9a1qa301ededf6c11336@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:16:38 -0700 Message-Id: <1208913398.13800.8.camel@localhost> (sfid-20080423_031727_521310_83F4B3AE) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 03:23 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > It's in 7.3.2 table 20 in 11h draft I have here and in table 26 in > 11ma (unified version) > These numbers are being used for few years already. This is what for > example Cisco APs are using > so I have strong feeling it won't change. > > Not sure why you are looking for it in 11n spec > > I suggest we renumber MESH stuff. I agree, will try to send a patch tomorrow. -- Luis Carlos Cobo Rus GnuPG ID: 44019B60 cozybit Inc.