Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:47918 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751900AbYDUOmN (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:42:13 -0400 Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] iwl3945: Disabled channels From: Johannes Berg To: Brian Morrison Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <480CA260.70506@fenrir.org.uk> (sfid-20080421_162006_486515_D95FEC5E) References: <480C5AFF.5020005@fenrir.org.uk> (sfid-20080421_101455_395583_495A4EE6) <1208785818.26186.101.camel@johannes.berg> <480CA260.70506@fenrir.org.uk> (sfid-20080421_162006_486515_D95FEC5E) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Epgzci5d0I192CEVw72j" Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 16:41:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1208788898.26186.105.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080421_164305_253653_50D02B2E) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-Epgzci5d0I192CEVw72j Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > OK, sorry about the naming mixup, you are, of course, correct. I have=20 > not really got to grips with how all these different sub-systems fit=20 > together. I also see that the mac80211 and cfg80211 changes that are in=20 > Fedora have not made it into mainline 2.6.25, so I assume it will go=20 > into 2.6.26? It should, yes. > >=20 > > Does anyone have that info? I can dig up the info for Germany easily > > (the "Frequenznutzungsplan" is available on the regulatory agency web > > site as pdf) >=20 > Here is a link that came from the Wikipedia page I mentioned in my post: >=20 > http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=3D8571&L=3D1&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Buid%5D= =3D232&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Bannee%5D=3D2003&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Btheme%5D= =3D0&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Bmotscle%5D=3D&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5BbackID%5D=3D21= 22&cHash=3Da558568045 >=20 > This document applies to the list of 58 departements shown. I can't say I particularly care about France, but even from the wikipedia page you linked previously it is rather clear that we cannot define a "EU" regulatory domain because Spain and France are in the EU yet have not adopted the "European" regulatory requirements. johannes --=-Epgzci5d0I192CEVw72j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUASAynoaVg1VMiehFYAQKeNxAAuSrC8agC/0iQZU4WAla0FNdMBDrR5m5p h5zVzervXLrctZKuhMtGF+BSJ+bqOjXXeonQDaWmaoNXBMkmgQvTjKbRcYoo2GTx ZxULpL6gSL9iTuPt7kI+BFnuCvl/TtzeytHK1ThMjAqRnRZCp8KrXC8gwvxxisVC 1oRT1sLR2nv9MeH8P8z4rKhWtHtV16v06mxdLwYm1gCqjshU6CWXSJOpE/j3PpL3 K+sLQUDQDG4WzdYX7ycWFRCDC1RC/nsozPCq+Zzf5u/udwzE6nHSYYG9RBWT+zuT qw5QNCCTC3OQVkXfnsETs1do6gCkoTAMj0Blo/E+u2o7l7Ba1CLQujmc21m9U5rx WnBwrKVYhonQ5DLr6X89fYs6yIISt7okuO5BLQHIxE8sL+OewxAbhjs6Ra7lkhQK B9cHONPnZtZqBnRe4/3F7UurIFlzxCeiw9L6X/Lj768btDaa70wp/zrcr4NQGkX6 qikpp4AsEJXJwdVAFlKKUQfBrcBnmLbaAMaXMU9//V+3r1hn8g0VTGzDKi6pfSmY c08OLRgxXj3C/JJkig7fOk9dcPlNnL929aGoysdKDxxF9OXD8Tty/tKG19TTj501 jbscZKACqSA6HFi7hgr7GdNLvpO2F/jrUJ/q587MF1hanHdCpxwoVx4NqucicCOE xYdwD5YHHm4= =l8Mh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Epgzci5d0I192CEVw72j--