Return-path: Received: from mx.fenrir.org.uk ([81.168.115.223]:33008 "EHLO mx.fenrir.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754865AbYDUOTO (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:19:14 -0400 Received: from [62.189.241.202] (helo=[10.104.10.102]) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) by mx.fenrir.org.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JnwrQ-0005iu-UF for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:19:13 +0100 Message-ID: <480CA260.70506@fenrir.org.uk> (sfid-20080421_162006_486515_D95FEC5E) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:19:12 +0100 From: Brian Morrison MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] iwl3945: Disabled channels References: <480C5AFF.5020005@fenrir.org.uk> (sfid-20080421_101455_395583_495A4EE6) <1208785818.26186.101.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1208785818.26186.101.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg wrote: >> If you're in the EU, I contributed a fix that has not yet made it into >> the iwlwifi code as it is under review (the whole regulatory aspect is >> difficult, there are so many caveats!). > > Technically, it's cfg80211 code; the reason that it's not in yet is that > I'm unsure about the legal situation of the ETSI and the national > bodies, it seems to me that the ultimate decision is done by the > national bodies and last I heard France had quite different restrictions > than Germany, for example. OK, sorry about the naming mixup, you are, of course, correct. I have not really got to grips with how all these different sub-systems fit together. I also see that the mac80211 and cfg80211 changes that are in Fedora have not made it into mainline 2.6.25, so I assume it will go into 2.6.26? > > Does anyone have that info? I can dig up the info for Germany easily > (the "Frequenznutzungsplan" is available on the regulatory agency web > site as pdf) Here is a link that came from the Wikipedia page I mentioned in my post: http://www.arcep.fr/index.php?id=8571&L=1&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Buid%5D=232&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Bannee%5D=2003&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Btheme%5D=0&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5Bmotscle%5D=&tx_gsactualite_pi1%5BbackID%5D=2122&cHash=a558568045 This document applies to the list of 58 departements shown. It says that with these departments all channels may be used indoors at +20dBm (100mW). Outdoors +10dBm (10mW) is allowed on all channels but below 2454MHz +20dBm (100mW) is allowed. Another quick check shows that there are 100 departements in France. Also note that this dates from 2002 and states that new lists of departements will be published in 2003 and 2004, so presumably the number of departements will have increased by now. I can't imagine how this regulatory mess is enforceable or how any other OS/hardware combination does it. I'll have to say that I work for a company that produces Wi-Fi chips and products based on them and that we find the whole regulatory situation worldwide just as confusing as everyone else does. A complete country/regulatory map is going to be very difficult to research and implement, I assume that we can't go far wrong if we used something like the Intel EEPROM contents as a guide to what can be done? I assume that local infrastructure will comply with local restrictions, so it's mainly IBSS use that needs controlling. And power output, which could be difficult if we need to know whether we're outdoors or not. Comments folks? -- Brian