Return-path: Received: from s131.mittwaldmedien.de ([62.216.178.31]:28604 "EHLO s131.mittwaldmedien.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752561AbYDIICo (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 04:02:44 -0400 Received: from lin01.mn-solutions.de (pD95FBA15.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.95.186.21]) by s131.mittwaldmedien.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704B45E4022 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 10:02:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mnz66.mn-solutions.de (mnz66.mn-logistik.de [192.168.233.66]) by lin01.mn-solutions.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E761E000E for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:59:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Holger Schurig To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANN] WiMAX stack and drivers for Intel WiMAX Link 5050 Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 09:59:47 +0200 References: <200804011107.38563.inaky@linux.intel.com> <20080408135601.5dad3566@speedy> <200804081359.03611.inaky@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <200804081359.03611.inaky@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200804090959.47619.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20080409_090251_129231_CA5CB200) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > 9. Anyway to reuse existing usbnet infrastructure? > > Nope, the 2400 is a pure IP device (as Marcel mentioned). With "pure IP", do you mean IPv4? Or do you mean "pure IPv4/IPv6"? If it is "pure IPv4", then WiMAX seems not future proof ...