Return-path: Received: from crystal.sipsolutions.net ([195.210.38.204]:57588 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757033AbYDDOvT (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Apr 2008 10:51:19 -0400 Subject: Re: mac80211 -- My log files are filling up with: "wlan0: RX non-WEP frame, but expected encryption" From: Johannes Berg To: Jouni Malinen Cc: Miles Lane , Jiri Benc , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <20080403165255.GI2025@jm.kir.nu> References: <1207226756.3636.66.camel@johannes.berg> <1207231313.3636.100.camel@johannes.berg> <20080403165255.GI2025@jm.kir.nu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9IF0QjAmHQdQ0oioxsxM" Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:51:11 +0200 Message-Id: <1207320671.19189.36.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080404_155123_080883_E193A16A) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-9IF0QjAmHQdQ0oioxsxM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Duration: 44 > What's wrong with the duration field value? The dump here does not > indicate which transmit rate was used, so I don't know what TX rate the > ACK would use, but 44 sounds like a reasonable duration value for > 802.11g rates.. Yes, you're perfectly right, my rough estimate was totally off, I miscalculated. > > Does anybody have an explanation for that except that the AP software i= s > > messing it up? >=20 > Looks like an interesting AP behavior to me.. For some values of interesting... :) > > In any case, I suppose the message in question isn't actually necessary= . > > I'll make it depend on verbose debugging maybe. >=20 > Yes, that sounds reasonable. The AP should not be sending this kind of > crap, but well, what can you do if it does.. In theory, this could also > be showing up in multi-SSID configuration when another SSID is > configured to use unencrypted frames (though, that would cause interop > issues in association for number of clients..). That would be ... interesting. But yeah, the message doesn't have much value, it just tells you your peer might be buggy... johannes --=-9IF0QjAmHQdQ0oioxsxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIVAwUAR/ZAXqVg1VMiehFYAQIjDw//WvREJtSnWb+6g1Gg3s7z/+x40Rt3+Z1C 0JFJFiSIOPq4O9OXI2rRau7uL5i3Que1w5FqJycTRPd1oh+8uDuWqA5H5iEdH8d4 EYMEJIBsBU0xgNN3941mDETvL54E140zq1gX1uyVCUwRK0YZ6C8GnmQsyNg/xY6x 3V/veCRVnux44UDcPwlPx2p+iW/p9JtVbnQdkeIXsAiiqTY7/ugy2lq1OZzDUmK6 ZOYrbPwPcD3zs30b+7Ayrk+tVcZHi0elJJbRBU3C9MjaQvBKkDvMVkUwnmRi2/Cf erqbx6rn4i9rJs107SFuTzJQsfZIdVLFIZilfEFBDUW2TVqnkep5bKt4yQ0CH6Ev bYmemYunqb5BxG91ngeIU3VN41wg7F/FVF8KX20nhiXUQBO3ib4moAQzGV7Tb2lH oEnb4Br37Ga7GbaJK6q1G1UB2tj720G5Wab4fH+D7UTIB11vysWzhYtn7BrqgQWS w/a4ygEaoT/BNarq15D351dAaSiNjYQCjWhhXgQeG9zz0ugGWC4IFCH6UlWm86W0 B8u7SCN1gy6PcIBiLjzOe1yzVhEtTVoFuvHF4DQRTFMACPEc3dU+fBEJ70VJ5xES r/apCtNrKhjOrl+54fCANOsZWJBsTco48fZHBdRnvKEiw8f1ehk54xuxp8iqxvSo /H0TQ52zyXg= =XN8O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9IF0QjAmHQdQ0oioxsxM--