Return-path: Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.178]:42639 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753128AbYEVPqN (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2008 11:46:13 -0400 Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id s27so75162ele.1 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 08:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: (sfid-20080522_174616_294968_0A534157) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 17:46:11 +0200 From: drago01 To: "Pavel Roskin" Subject: Re: [PATCH WIP] rtl8187b support Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1211470467.10933.57.camel@dv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1211470467.10933.57.camel@dv> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x0, 0x0B7); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x1, 0xEE0); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x2, 0x44D); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x3, 0x441); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x4, 0x8C3); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x5, 0xC72); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x6, 0x0E6); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x7, 0x82A); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x8, 0x03F); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0x9, 0x335); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0xa, 0x9D4); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0xb, 0x7BB); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0xc, 0x850); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0xd, 0xCDF); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0xe, 0x02B); msleep(1); > + rtl8225_write(dev, 0xf, 0x114); msleep(1); wouldn't it make sense to let rtl8225_write always call msleep(1) ?