Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2923 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755795AbYEMMwo (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2008 08:52:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 08:30:01 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Johannes Berg Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach , Jouni Malinen , Linux Wireless , Tomas Winkler Subject: Re: 11n + wpa_supplicant Message-ID: <20080513123001.GA3279@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080513_145246_963681_55C6891A) References: <8704f27d0805130118p6f597743sebed5a2cdb6d59cb@mail.gmail.com> <1210667328.3646.24.camel@johannes.berg> <8704f27d0805130141s403167b8q49eecb645d0461c1@mail.gmail.com> <1210668421.3646.43.camel@johannes.berg> <8704f27d0805130148t57a1dad5nf5ff535ae4ddf968@mail.gmail.com> <1210670248.3646.54.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1210670248.3646.54.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 11:17:28AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > Ah, so you mean if the user chose TKIP then we should associate as a > > > legacy STA? > > > > > > > I think so... If the AP is N-only we would be in trouble... > > Hm. I don't really see much reason to do this. Technically, you could > configure it this way, but in practice most people will just enable all > algorithms they can support (i.e. all). > > I don't really care, but I wouldn't want to complicate wext further for > this. Amen to that... -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com