Return-path: Received: from smtp.rutgers.edu ([128.6.72.243]:33083 "EHLO annwn13.rutgers.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355AbYFVCSn (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:18:43 -0400 From: Michael Wu To: Harvey Harrison Subject: Re: [PATCH] adm8211: remove masking of protected bit Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 22:21:43 -0400 Cc: linux-wireless , John Linville References: <1213932851.6591.8.camel@brick> In-Reply-To: <1213932851.6591.8.camel@brick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1482037.mfS5CJcm8U"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200806212221.54814.flamingice@sourmilk.net> (sfid-20080622_041848_775588_07527AFA) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart1482037.mfS5CJcm8U Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 19 June 2008 23:34:10 Harvey Harrison wrote: > I'm not sure if this was intentional, please review. If it was intention= al > the two if-blocks should probably be deleted. > This was intentional. The key configuration code for adm8211 was never hook= ed=20 up so the hardware can't do encryption. You can remove the checks for the=20 protected frame bit. Just leave the local fc variable in. =2DMichael Wu --nextPart1482037.mfS5CJcm8U Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIXbdCT3Oqt9AH4aERAsx8AJ9ianJi5KX3XazdvXA2Ma4/IH1C+gCfYQEv YmM+p1WVTdK95tWoWKmuohA= =dYZ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1482037.mfS5CJcm8U--