Return-path: Received: from smtp.rutgers.edu ([128.6.72.243]:32331 "EHLO annwn14.rutgers.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbYF3DAv (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:00:51 -0400 From: Michael Wu To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [PATCH] Comment out duplicate device entry Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 23:04:52 -0400 Cc: Ben Collins , Linus Torvalds , kernel list , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <1214495838.7150.10.camel@cunning> <20080626161152.GE22025@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> In-Reply-To: <20080626161152.GE22025@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart41893139.k7kBxD6hNI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200806292304.58429.flamingice@sourmilk.net> (sfid-20080630_050119_621708_1DBB385E) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart41893139.k7kBxD6hNI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 26 June 2008 12:11:52 Adrian Bunk wrote: > But it shouldn't be listed as both version 1 and version 2 device. > It could be both! They're a bit lazy about changing usb/pci ids with differ= ent=20 cards anyway so I wouldn't be surprised. The driver differentiates the devi= ce=20 version using a more reliable method anyway so it doesn't matter. This devi= ce=20 id list was just copied from the islsm driver so I can't say for sure if=20 there's both version 1 and version 2 devices sharing the same usb id. =2DMichael Wu --nextPart41893139.k7kBxD6hNI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIaE1aT3Oqt9AH4aERAvNaAJ95oDEvidMJdzz0s/7wL0UmI7Z02gCeKFD9 8AZsrQeSviJM72Y+K9umHvg= =xL9Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart41893139.k7kBxD6hNI--