Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.228]:31042 "EHLO
	rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754311AbYFJPJo (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:09:44 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so937788rvb.1
        for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:09:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <19f34abd0806100809j6d26f62bte961a34b2c448f3c@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080610_170948_611508_6CD4CFDC)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:09:43 +0200
From: "Vegard Nossum" <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
To: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>,
	"Michael Buesch" <mb@bu3sch.de>,
	"FUJITA Tomonori" <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: BUG: NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 -- IP: [<f8e783d5>] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <a44ae5cd0806100742t1bd275dib43c5d72b3dd9659@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
References: <a44ae5cd0806100709rf4602f2x587631852502c0b5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <19f34abd0806100729h7a060012h91e81248c9c7cdca@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200806101634.21576.mb@bu3sch.de> <200806101637.11473.mb@bu3sch.de>
	 <a44ae5cd0806100742t1bd275dib43c5d72b3dd9659@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On 6/10/08, Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to label the kernel tree.  It is 2.6.26-rc5-mm2.

No worries, it was in your config file :-)

Thanks for reporting.


On 6/10/08, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de> wrote:
> Ok, FUJITA Tomonori, please make sure a patch like the following goes
>  into the same trees that you submitted commit 353c409 to.
>  Also make sure to check b43legacy. I _guess_ you might have added
>  the same bug there.

Can you please also make sure that Miles Lane appears with a
Reported-by line in your patch? Thanks :-) Also: Nice fix!


Vegard

-- 
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
	-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036