Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:21467 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751188AbYFPBkg (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:40:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [BUG] iwlwifi 3945 works only with disable_hw_scan=1 From: Zhu Yi To: Dan Williams Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <1213368350.9783.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <484FF375.8010002@gmail.com> <1213237561.7814.688.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <48511B1D.4010901@gmail.com> <1213282970.6589.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1213322439.7814.770.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <1213368350.9783.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:40:11 +0800 Message-Id: <1213580411.7814.877.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> (sfid-20080616_093315_575304_4F787DE1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2008-06-13 at 10:45 -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > SW rfkill doesn't necessarily kill the device. Input-only switches > (like Fn+F5 on thinkpads for exampel) aren't handled by the kernel > rfkill system and thus something in userspace needs to handle them > instead. It's probably worth checking the radio state when the event > comes in and only if the radio isn't already disabled, then set tx > power off. OK. That makes sense. Thanks, -yi