Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:2513 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762888AbYFFQ2R (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:28:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 12:03:16 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Florian Manschwetus Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: iwl4965 and 2.6.25 iwlwifi merge patch Message-ID: <20080606160316.GA635@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080606_182840_732729_C0793576) References: <4849220D.70301@gmx.de> <4849386B.6010308@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4849386B.6010308@gmx.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 03:15:23PM +0200, Florian Manschwetus wrote: > drago01 schrieb: >> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Florian Manschwetus >> wrote: >>> Some people reported me that this patch makes there T61 with iwl4965 >>> useless. But I'm not an owner of such a wireless device so, I'm unable to >>> test or verify this. So it would be nice if someone could tell me if there >>> are patches and how well they work. So that I could include the iwlwifi >>> merge patch in my next patchlist. >> >> which patch are you talking about? > the one i attached. Where did you get that patch? Who told you to use it? Where are you trying to apply it? And why is this our problem? John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com