Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3916 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758374AbYFLOHD (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:07:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:59:36 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Zhu Yi Cc: Maxim Levitsky , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [BUG] iwlwifi 3945 works only with disable_hw_scan=1 Message-ID: <20080612135936.GA5031@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080612_160707_406717_273DB365) References: <484FEA26.1040305@gmail.com> <1213241315.7814.696.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1213241315.7814.696.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:28:35AM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > I don't understand why "disable_hw_scan=1" works for you. Can you also > attach the dmesg for it? How does the hardware scan differ from what mac80211 does when scanning? I still see a lot of mysterious iwlwifi (especially iwl3945) problems in Fedora that seem to disappear with disable_hw_scan=1. Honestly I'm tempted to change it to "enable_hw_scan" instead... John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com