Return-path: Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:40097 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751085AbYFYIIW (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:08:22 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KBQ37-0000E7-EC for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:08:17 +0000 Received: from lst-amand-152-33-14-15.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.127.45.15]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:08:17 +0000 Received: from fabien by lst-amand-152-33-14-15.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 08:08:17 +0000 To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Fabien Crespel Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] rfkill: add parameter to disable radios by default Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:11:54 +0200 Message-ID: <4861FDCA.1040505@crespel.net> (sfid-20080625_100827_444690_DF7F1FA0) References: <1214252588-30723-1-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <1214252588-30723-5-git-send-email-hmh@hmh.eng.br> <20080624231751.GA28975@khazad-dum.debian.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed In-Reply-To: <20080624231751.GA28975@khazad-dum.debian.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Sounds interesting. But is this functionality worth the hassle of > implementing it? For the end user, I think it's better to have the device state restored at boot time if it's possible. Even though it can be tricky to implement, as you outlined. - Fabien.