Return-path: Received: from web51410.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.189]:32927 "HELO web51410.mail.re2.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750880AbYFKUio convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:38:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:38:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Joerg Pommnitz Reply-To: pommnitz@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [RFC] First CRDA integration work To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <43e72e890806110309l2600637p82866531cf2f7e6c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-ID: <684075.48049.qm@web51410.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (sfid-20080611_223852_382884_0707852E) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --- Luis R. Rodriguez wrote am Mi, 11.6.2008: > Can you elaborate a bit more on it. Why do you need two > separate WLAN > devices on one node where each one of them is using very > different > regulatory rules? The interface connected to the amplifier provides long range communication (up to 5km) on reserved channels. The nodes work as routers/APs that provide access to "normal" WLAN devices (this is where the second wireless device comes into play). So: * two WLAN devices: 1x long range with amplifier, 1x short range as AP * different regulatory settings: the regulatory rules for the device with amplifier differ from those without amplifier. > Do they both use the same frequency > ranges? This is not required. Currently both use channels in the 2.4GHz range, but there is a very good chance that we will move into the 5GHz range for the amplified backbone (yes, we know that this will come at a cost). > Luis Thanks for taking an interest Joerg __________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail. Dem pfiffigeren Posteingang. http://de.overview.mail.yahoo.com