Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:47708 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751424AbYFZRzp (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:55:45 -0400 Subject: Re: RFC: always enable MAC80211_RC_PID? From: Mattias Nissler To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Johannes Berg , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Adrian Bunk , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20080624124311.GC16021@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> References: <20080622125553.GB22539@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <43e72e890806220804i347b942claae7b725231afcce@mail.gmail.com> <1214298259.8967.260.camel@johannes.berg> <20080624124311.GC16021@cs181140183.pp.htv.fi> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 19:55:42 +0200 Message-Id: <1214502942.4432.6.camel@localhost> (sfid-20080626_195550_830306_CDA8F6F9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Just what I remember about the discussion that led to the ugly Makefile. On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 15:43 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Can we get one of either: > - all selected mac80211 algorithms are built into the mac80211 module or IIRC, this was originally voted against because this approach would increase kernel image size or module size unnecessarily. > - all selected mac80211 algorithms (including the default one) are in > their own modules The argument against this was that there are people who don't compile in module autoloading, can't figure out what's wrong (in spite of the syslog message) and complain about wireless not working... Anyway, I always liked any of the two things you suggested better than what we have now. Mattias