Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:28449 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754358AbYFJOmk (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:42:40 -0400 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so1648062ywe.1 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: (sfid-20080610_164254_665012_33C73DB2) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:42:38 -0400 From: "Miles Lane" To: "Michael Buesch" Subject: Re: BUG: NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 -- IP: [] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155 Cc: "Vegard Nossum" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <200806101637.11473.mb@bu3sch.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <19f34abd0806100729h7a060012h91e81248c9c7cdca@mail.gmail.com> <200806101634.21576.mb@bu3sch.de> <200806101637.11473.mb@bu3sch.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sorry, I forgot to label the kernel tree. It is 2.6.26-rc5-mm2. On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:34:21 Michael Buesch wrote: >> On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:29:17 Vegard Nossum wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Michael Buesch wrote: >> > > On Tuesday 10 June 2008 16:09:37 Miles Lane wrote: >> > >> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000 >> > >> IP: [] :b43:b43_dma_mapping_error+0x16/0x155 >> > > >> > > >> > > It seems to crash at >> > > 60 extern const struct dma_mapping_ops *dma_ops; >> > > 61 >> > > 62 static inline int dma_mapping_error(dma_addr_t dma_addr) >> > > 63 { >> > > 64 if (dma_ops->mapping_error) >> > > 65 return dma_ops->mapping_error(dma_addr); >> > > 66 >> > > 67 return (dma_addr == bad_dma_address); >> > > 68 } >> > >> > No, this is wrong. >> > >> > /* Check if a DMA mapping address is invalid. */ >> > static bool b43_dma_mapping_error(struct b43_dmaring *ring, >> > dma_addr_t addr, >> > size_t buffersize, bool dma_to_device) >> > { >> > if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(ring->dev->dev->dma_dev, addr))) >> > >> > It crashes on this line ---^ >> >> Which calls dma_mapping_error(), correct? >> >> But you are right. I see the bug now. >> ring->dev is assigned after the call. >> I wonder why it works reliably on all of my machines. >> > > Ehm no wait a second... > What strange tree are you looking at? > This is a copy of the code from my local tree. > > 516 /* Check if a DMA mapping address is invalid. */ > 517 static bool b43_dma_mapping_error(struct b43_dmaring *ring, > 518 dma_addr_t addr, > 519 size_t buffersize, bool dma_to_device) > 520 { > 521 if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(addr))) > 522 return 1; > > This code is perfectly fine. > This must be some merge error in some upstream tree. > > -- > Greetings Michael. >