Return-path: Received: from mx51.mymxserver.com ([85.199.173.110]:35170 "EHLO mx51.mymxserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753350AbYG2Lip (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:38:45 -0400 From: Holger Schurig To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.27-rc1: zd1211rw association fails Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:38:30 +0200 Cc: Johannes Berg , Alistair John Strachan References: <200807291225.00679.alistair@devzero.co.uk> <1217330777.10489.21.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1217330777.10489.21.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200807291338.30121.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> (sfid-20080729_133847_467193_12A51EC1) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Well, the latter has archives. Yeah, but you could at least give a the subject for the message, just saying "the patch I just posted" can be misleading, especially if somebody posts as many patch as yours. Please don't take the next sentence personally: I wonder why you responded in the first place if you're so visibly annoyed :-)