Return-path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.246]:28714 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757727AbYG0Voo (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:44:44 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d40so859646and.103 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 14:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52d4a3890807271444v230162f2q16a81a8a03810c14@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080727_234450_410175_8CC0E804) Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:44:43 +0300 From: "Mohammed Gamal" To: "Larry Finger" Subject: Re: Fw: [Oops] b43 driver on 2.6.26 Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <488CE95B.2090606@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <20080727135840.a040e368.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <52d4a3890807271402n792dbaces52555f545a7bfa46@mail.gmail.com> <488CE95B.2090606@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Larry Finger wrote: > Mohammed Gamal wrote: >> >> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Andrew Morton >> wrote: >>> >>> Begin forwarded message: >>> >>> Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:03:24 +0300 >>> From: "Mohammed Gamal" >>> To: linux-net@vger.kernel.org >>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>> Subject: [Oops] b43 driver on 2.6.26 >>> >>> >>> I get the following oops with b43 driver on scanning for wireless >>> networks. >>> ---- >>> [...] >> >> Ignore this, I'm no longer getting this oops on the latest git tree. > > This message came from a BUG_ON statement in __netif_schedule(). A > subsequent > commit changed it to a WARN_ON, and finally commit 5b3ab1d removed it > completely > as the tested condition was essentially harmless. > > You should be aware that wireless has not worked since commit > 175f9c1bba9b825d22b142. See the thread at > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0807.3/0936.html for details. > This problem is not yet formally entered at bugzilla as a regression. > > Larry > Actually wireless is *partially* working for me. It seems that there's a lot of packet loss though.