Return-path: Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.178]:37542 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750757AbYG0Hh4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jul 2008 03:37:56 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id p76so2994877pyb.10 for ; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 00:37:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 11:37:25 +0400 From: Dmitry Baryshkov To: Ivo van Doorn Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RFKILL: set the status of the leds on activation. Message-ID: <20080727073725.GA20755@doriath.ww600.siemens.net> (sfid-20080727_093847_298117_84E36F93) References: <20080722102159.GA32682@doriath.ww600.siemens.net> <200807221911.35975.IvDoorn@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200807221911.35975.IvDoorn@gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:11:35PM +0200, Ivo van Doorn wrote: > On Tuesday 22 July 2008, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Provide default activate function to set the state of the led > > when the led becomes bound to the trigger > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov > > Cc: Ivo van Doorn > > Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh > > Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn Sorry to bother you, but can I expect these patches to be merged before 2.6.27, or should I wait for 2.6.28 window? -- With best wishes Dmitry