Return-path: Received: from venema.h4ckr.net ([217.24.1.135]:54982 "EHLO venema.h4ckr.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760391AbYGUFM7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:12:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1542.217.24.1.226.1216617177.squirrel@webmail.madwifi.org> (sfid-20080721_071304_721873_32A8D0F1) In-Reply-To: <20080720024554.GS17936@ruslug.rutgers.edu> References: <20080720024341.GQ17936@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20080720024500.GR17936@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20080720024554.GS17936@ruslug.rutgers.edu> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:12:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH 2/4] Remove Atheros 11n devices from ath5k From: "Michael Renzmann" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi. Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Remove Atheros 11n devices from being claimed by ath5k as its > now handled by ath9k. I must admit that I can't tell it myself due to a lack of in-depth knowledge about both drivers, hence the question: why a new driver, rather than adding 11n support to ath5k and have a single driver for all Atheros chipsets? Bye, Mike