Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.232]:38479 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751472AbYGKM7v (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jul 2008 08:59:51 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so4414521rvb.1 for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 05:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240807110559x5d4bbbcx63bdf007bb99e067@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080711_150005_428556_D7C733C4) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 15:59:50 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: removing STAs while aggregation is in effect? Cc: "Ron Rindjunsky" , linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1215770111.3483.112.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1215770111.3483.112.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > Hi Ron, > > Quick question: I was looking through the new tx queue rework davem did > and couldn't immediately tell whether or not the right thing happens > when a STA is removed while aggregation is in effect. Say mac80211 is > operating as an AP and a STA disassociates in the middle of an > aggregation session, I can see nothing that guarantees the aggregation > queue will be drained and returned to the pool etc. > > Am I missing something? > We found that too. We will soon release dissociation patches for review. Tomas > johannes >