Return-path: Received: from smtp.rutgers.edu ([128.6.72.243]:58642 "EHLO annwn13.rutgers.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751778AbYGPGFK (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:05:10 -0400 From: Michael Wu To: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski Subject: Re: [RFC] Merge tx/rx descriptor flags of rtl818x devices Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:11:18 -0400 Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Andrea Merello References: <200807111656.40342.herton@mandriva.com.br> In-Reply-To: <200807111656.40342.herton@mandriva.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9655269.uWtSkdpC1W"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Message-Id: <200807160211.22995.flamingice@sourmilk.net> (sfid-20080716_080516_292838_B33A229C) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart9655269.uWtSkdpC1W Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 11 July 2008 15:56:39 Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > In rtl818x code tx/rx descriptor flags are common between all devices as > far as I could check (looking at r8180 specs I found on the web recently > and on vendor rtl8187b driver). Here is a proposal for merging them: Go ahead and s/[RFC]/[PATCH]/ if you've made sure the numbers are the same = and=20 tested. This is a good idea. =2DMichael Wu --nextPart9655269.uWtSkdpC1W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIfZEKT3Oqt9AH4aERApmrAJsGUU7aZr2pTGY5akNt9PtunkUiOACg2XiY EF/dZcYHX7mPVUxPqV3I1/I= =xLY4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9655269.uWtSkdpC1W--