Return-path: Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:57677 "EHLO out3.smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751881AbYGDUFT (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:05:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:55:43 -0300 From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh To: Dan Williams Cc: Zhu Yi , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Question on rfkill double block Message-ID: <20080704195543.GB27898@khazad-dum.debian.net> (sfid-20080704_220527_503207_4C2A32EF) References: <1214982208.14590.473.camel@debian.sh.intel.com> <1215018189.29117.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1215018189.29117.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 02 Jul 2008, Dan Williams wrote: > That would be more useful than the current enum, yes. Dan, you do have a strong user case for "just software rfkilled", "just hardware rfkilled" and "soft+hard rfkilled" as opposed to simply "software rfkilled" and "hardware rfkilled, maybe software rfkilled as well" ? -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh