Return-path: Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.176]:27344 "EHLO ik-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751772AbYG3U5M (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:57:12 -0400 Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c28so184769ika.5 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: (sfid-20080730_225716_799796_99B85AB9) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:57:09 +0200 From: drago01 To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: Vendor support stickers for devices supported under Linux wireless Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <43e72e890807301327j54be2453r836964c708d75458@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <43e72e890807301327j54be2453r836964c708d75458@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > A while back during our second Linux wireless summit we thought about > the possibility of letting vendors choose a sticker depending upon the > type of support they had for Linux: > > http://wireless.kernel.org/CertificationIdeas > > I propose we consolidate to just stick to one logo/sticker: You > properly support Linux. > > What this means is your driver is in the kernel and if you have > firmware this would mean you also provide a friendly redistributable > license for the firmware. We could even put the name of the driver on > the sticker/logo. Thoughts? I would rather do s/driver name/kernel version/ ... its easier for users that way.