Return-path: Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.228]:35384 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751633AbYG3U7A (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:59:00 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 69so200037wri.5 for ; Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <43e72e890807301358r6d8cadc1j4f40b501319fb7dc@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080730_225903_471467_84258072) Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:58:44 -0700 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: drago01 Subject: Re: Vendor support stickers for devices supported under Linux wireless Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <43e72e890807301327j54be2453r836964c708d75458@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 1:57 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> A while back during our second Linux wireless summit we thought about >> the possibility of letting vendors choose a sticker depending upon the >> type of support they had for Linux: >> >> http://wireless.kernel.org/CertificationIdeas >> >> I propose we consolidate to just stick to one logo/sticker: You >> properly support Linux. >> >> What this means is your driver is in the kernel and if you have >> firmware this would mean you also provide a friendly redistributable >> license for the firmware. We could even put the name of the driver on >> the sticker/logo. Thoughts? > > I would rather do s/driver name/kernel version/ ... its easier for > users that way. True, do you mean since a specific kernel version? Luis