Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.25]:60329 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752500AbYH1Mnz (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 08:43:55 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so106228eyi.37 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 05:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240808280543qbcb769n74fc8fa733d951a2@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080828_144414_963990_80D07298) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:43:54 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] iwlwifi: fix apm_stop Cc: "Marcel Holtmann" , "Zhu Yi" , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Mohamed Abbas" In-Reply-To: <1219926182.25321.14.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1219915510-3647-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-2-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-3-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-4-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-5-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-6-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-7-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219926807.6064.17.camel@californication> <1ba2fa240808280421g642ddc62j7541837f874f79df@mail.gmail.com> <1219926182.25321.14.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:21 +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: >> > Hi Yi, >> > >> >> The patch fixes CSR_GP_CNTRL_REG_FLAG_INIT_DONE was set instead of >> >> cleared which disabled moving device to D0U state. >> > >> > when was this mistake introduced. Is it a regression compared to what we >> > have in 2.6.26? >> >> Again. think of global warming. > > If you're so concerned about global warming, why didn't you fix this, > umm, months ago? :) Why I didn't fix everything in the single point of time. 'In the beginning there was a driver' > > Frankly, this sounds like a "quick, somebody help me come up with a good > argument" argument. So how can I really reason this :) Tomas