Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:58326 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751062AbYHOUNA (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Aug 2008 16:13:00 -0400 From: Chr To: Johannes Berg Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: Fix for TX sequence number problem that resulted from commit 741b4fbc44 Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:15:05 +0200 Cc: Larry Finger , John W Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <48987e74.ct5+sLOpTbiTPPHq%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <200808152034.46346.chunkeey@web.de> <1218828375.3197.0.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1218828375.3197.0.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Message-Id: <200808152215.05761.chunkeey@web.de> (sfid-20080815_221304_514323_F90670BE) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Friday 15 August 2008 21:26:15 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2008-08-15 at 20:34 +0200, Chr wrote: > > Hmm, or there's something else can't count?!?? > > > > Anyway, the firmware will always assign (as in overwrite) the > > sequence number for every transmitted frame... unfortunatly > > there isn't a uniform way to disable this behaviour. > > If it always does that, then it cannot be implementing QoS properly. hmm? has this something to do with the per STA TID in 7.1.3.4.1 (802.11-2007) ? Well the firmware (aka: LowerMAC) has some sort station database so there could be some room for that... maybe. (But yes, when I was playing with the AP/IBSS, all beacon frames had a running sequence counter... maybe you can see this with a cx3110x in IBSS mode too?!) Regards, Chr