Return-path: Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.78.25]:45192 "EHLO ey-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751828AbYH1LG0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:06:26 -0400 Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 6so96486eyi.37 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240808280406y4056a8bfufcd09f9b976e1074@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080828_130629_762003_AB2358C4) Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:06:24 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Marcel Holtmann" Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] iwlwifi: remove false rxon if rx chain changes Cc: "Zhu Yi" , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Mohamed Abbas" In-Reply-To: <1219926653.6064.13.camel@californication> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <1219915510-3647-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-2-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-3-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-4-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-5-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219926653.6064.13.camel@californication> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Yi, > >> Rx chain might change during power save transitions but it doesn't >> requires full rxon. The patch avoids the rxon by removing the rx_chain >> check. > > and again. Is this a regression. What is the down side or impact from > not doing this. Did we used to do it different in 2.6.26? Yes this one is regression this is new code and causes disconnection. Tomas