Return-path: Received: from hostap.isc.org ([149.20.54.63]:39214 "EHLO hostap.isc.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751665AbYHSRjt (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:39:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:38:42 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen To: Dan Williams Cc: Lars Ericsson , 'Ivo van Doorn' , hostap@lists.shmoo.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, rt2400-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Rt2400-devel] mac80211 / rt2x00 / rt61 and adhoc status Message-ID: <20080819173842.GD4805@jm.kir.nu> (sfid-20080819_193955_254392_D9668119) References: <000001c90168$703248e0$0b3ca8c0@gotws1589> <1219088136.2154.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1219088136.2154.11.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 03:35:36PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 21:27 +0200, Lars Ericsson wrote: > > I have backported the patches to 0.5.9 and they works fine, as far as I can > > tell on 2.6.26. > > I can drop them here if they are of interest. I also vote for putting them > > into 0.5.x > > > > Jouni; would that be possible ? Sure. I'm usually merging all bug fixes from 0.6.x into the 0.5.x releases. > Jouni, if you like I could run through current git HEAD and identify > some easy candidates for backporting to 0.5.x, and send the 0.6 commit > ids to the hostap lists for you along with what needs to be done to > backport the patch. If the commit messages are clear, i.e., it is obvious that the changes are bug fixes, I should be able to find these without problems. If there is any unclarity on the status of the changes, a list could be helpful. Whenever I'm preparing a new release from a stable branch, I will go through the git tree and pick all changes that look like bug fixes (with more filtering for 0.4.x and 0.3.x to only get critical fixes). With that list, I'm going to be merging the changes in order into the stable branch. I would expect that the changes discussed here would fall into this process for automatic (well, with some manual labor ;-) inclusion into 0.5.x. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA