Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]:13695 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751423AbYHQQU4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 12:20:56 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1446029fgg.17 for ; Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240808170920r67e11567h2da8b396b18729dd@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080817_182101_288615_9EB6A8C6) Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:20:54 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch Cc: "Mirco Tischler" , "Leonid Podolny" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, IvDoorn@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20080817150242.GA23926@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <48A5EC02.4070303@gmail.com> <20080817035921.4d35ae0e@mtlp.12thdimension> <1ba2fa240808170004p63b76db1l1fdfb1cf1cb41636@mail.gmail.com> <20080817150242.GA23926@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close >> yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and >> are apparently wrong. > > Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even > if you don't know how to fix them)? > 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424 This one is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be acked by Yi or me. I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch. Thanks Tomas