Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:47127 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751785AbYHGOrE (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:47:04 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211/cfg80211: Add BSS configuration options for AP mode From: Johannes Berg To: Jouni Malinen Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Luis Carlos Cobo In-Reply-To: <20080807142732.GC5138@jm.kir.nu> References: <20080807134043.GA5138@jm.kir.nu> <1218116906.23048.179.camel@johannes.berg> <20080807141508.GB5138@jm.kir.nu> <1218118732.23048.183.camel@johannes.berg> <20080807142732.GC5138@jm.kir.nu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XWo73vt+jShVe0V7cNQE" Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:46:28 +0200 Message-Id: <1218120388.23048.189.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080807_164708_853961_1C4AEF41) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-XWo73vt+jShVe0V7cNQE Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 17:27 +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote: > > Yeah, that was a sticky point... But if you want per-BSS information yo= u > > really have to because right now it's per-hw. >=20 > Well, I don't actually need it per-BSS for hardware that I'm most likely > to work with ;-), but yeah, this is a per-BSS parameter, so in that > sense your patch is doing the correct thing. Yeah, ok, I guess I don't really care, do whichever way you want. It'd be a bit strange to set it with cfg80211 per BSS and have it show up on different BSSes, but that's about it, and a little strangeness hasn't hurt anyone ;) > > Ok, they can't be per VLAN then, true, but then I think we should limit > > it to _AP just so nobody tries setting them without effect on other > > devices or overrides, for _STA, what the AP said. For mesh I don't know > > (adding Luis) and for IBSS I'm not sure either. I suspect you could use > > it for IBSS too? >=20 > I think I'll just make it _AP only for now and if someone ever really > needs it for something else, they can enable it later.. It is possible > that new attributes that would be more reasonable for other modes will > be added in the future for _SET_BSS. Sure, sounds fine. johannes --=-XWo73vt+jShVe0V7cNQE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJImwrBAAoJEKVg1VMiehFY03oP/RIKuzCOTGSdtDBN+cjDkiVZ 3YUtNOej8opprMgBs52YBkqCCWQVnYFkZadVcHAmpEpKOWameSxXf+ISLnIZLhx1 QoAbi7ITde/fYh9JRLel0qau06P+GpRaGsb8Jo9UrTvnF8Buz70+qqFozFPN2am8 OlLpy2wFp91hd78B0BVEgOTSn6RFSBqTvNRxmfwj/OCe48wOgVmkKXv/zn32nrOK 5ZNugXySAfuoOr6Gn93NshkPY8Qfp9sDac+ufjRI6Rq8whFrYVk+WGrs0XWdYtTS KyhNqyjXkBQNXuzxeRL4hinF0w9lmOpcxPf/dnHsskVetS23DsAsV2x3tz3OE+6f FDq9HMfiM2p0s5y6XbXfyxpkjHPpEcFPdKUW72V4cmmrAXB7DSN0mR7//AGZImfK hE+gkVRU/8dNXMyFIRm63QvsMje0QfPJgymS4GETN/N3fdF/6HCtogcBwlKlQi62 Itw0IzTPtzVztOI1mBm8lhtJhoSRG/d/0Pa0THqZryiL7wWq8guEGHveFFzc/L0H EEzknImgM5AhCjpxWZu/TfuEulSYeD/P7gx5q23n4/QIIL4ggMS56fz/+Wp4053p X/nAY4SqHdjDpe6gOdJ0p5/p+rwcwbQJAi/nw52U3hWlTHNgmfHoxS/4vRVYUoSG r++F3+RmonlJ0lxr6MkH =5HBI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XWo73vt+jShVe0V7cNQE--