Return-path: Received: from fmmailgate02.web.de ([217.72.192.227]:42492 "EHLO fmmailgate02.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751335AbYHGIBj (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Aug 2008 04:01:39 -0400 From: Chr To: Larry Finger Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: Fix regression due to commit b19fa1f Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:33:51 +0200 Cc: Johannes Berg , davem@davemloft.net, John W Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <4897714b.z7H23Rca9Z4lOo4Q%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <200808070057.01952.chunkeey@web.de> <489A6D1F.1040409@lwfinger.net> In-Reply-To: <489A6D1F.1040409@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200808070933.52388.chunkeey@web.de> (sfid-20080807_100145_923482_8B48BA2A) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 07 August 2008 05:33:51 Larry Finger wrote: > > If it is made into a proper patch, I'll ACK it. > No problemo! but can you please tell me what you would like to see? I don't spot anything, except some extra tab damage at the EOL. That said, I didn't make much patches lately, so I probably need an bigger update about the latest "how-to-send-a-proper-patch" etiquette than I thought. ;-) Regards, Chr