Return-path: Received: from xc.sipsolutions.net ([83.246.72.84]:40629 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751677AbYH1Kw3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:52:29 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] iwlwifi: call apm stop on exit From: Johannes Berg To: Marcel Holtmann Cc: Zhu Yi , linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Gregory Greenman , Mohamed Abbas , Tomas Winkler In-Reply-To: <1219927149.6064.25.camel@californication> (sfid-20080828_123916_214502_EDFC473D) References: <1219915510-3647-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-2-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-3-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-4-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-5-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-6-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-7-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-8-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219915510-3647-9-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> <1219927149.6064.25.camel@californication> (sfid-20080828_123916_214502_EDFC473D) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/1FMz8QP9H3/ByaLCWA4" Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:52:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1219920741.25321.4.camel@johannes.berg> (sfid-20080828_125232_441117_102A7E58) Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-/1FMz8QP9H3/ByaLCWA4 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 14:39 +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Yi, >=20 > > This patch calls apm stop on exit and suspend and sets STATUS_EXIT_PEND= ING > > accordingly. Without this patch hardware consumes power even after driv= er > > is removed or suspended. >=20 > is this a regression to 2.6.26? That is always the important question > here since that will determine if the patch should go in. If the 2.6.26 > version did this better (even if not prefect), then this patch should go > on, otherwise it could wait until next merge window. AFAIR people have been complaining about this behaviour _forever_, so it's hardly a regression. johannes --=-/1FMz8QP9H3/ByaLCWA4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Johannes Berg (powerbook) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJItoNgAAoJEKVg1VMiehFYF7UQAJejBUpVCxfK+84/qc5DpYhr dmpssBFeprvKICgEZBZPfBqWFltl/EK5JUjWUBnvLosbxv6VmOeDIZhUieIUsBDj 8AbnFNyQbYVyZlH+k8ba/IxgDxZC6B+6nAv1+bnsgGdU457gr/Dnqw97beYctnqT 8azPyCeroq+SJ0QOAUTN7X3rRrLnSGLy1vGUxnI6EmdGo4KQVdKVteGZlnYx1KyH Hjpvy5QZQdAXpQVpLVZZw2KqY15yeVCi2fQHERzE5FD2RxTJF3zM90t+gJEcJ0Z8 xZ5X0XgWuWMOBtfOk8yHfVV6+h1Og8vTxpbPSJAgBMXckpcSvbba0L9LVqVrIIyD LB2AuA8Io/eywIouU/MgbBnBrD3K2nMVQc9Wlln+pcapCF2Xh17f1J8VpqM5X8hC ZytcnEhPPLVZ8Arcd2paAjVmrG8+6NNqg/wQQrDaQDbkTnnAo+GzLB22GqhDIG7H o9A0JHXDzziJvBoFBfAYZmCEKFYReA7wEGIp4IsZP6RNTcCxYwQkknKaPVpUWS5T radKudd9BYjtiHdGvyzl6lhcm8gw8oa/vE2X13eznCbj4YhXmXSabSGHRcQ7H7+T nDEU5uNuGg+OTfHn8oqTRFCSE1WEb31rLQUbSTIDXcP8eNCgALeuOxWbdr3Asovm HNarZSAr4C82t+JLEgIK =HYyL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/1FMz8QP9H3/ByaLCWA4--