Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:3690 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751619AbYHQPcd (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:32:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 11:02:42 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Tomas Winkler Cc: Mirco Tischler , Leonid Podolny , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, IvDoorn@gmail.com Subject: Re: CPU load after killing iwlagn with RF kill switch Message-ID: <20080817150242.GA23926@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20080817_173248_029400_0B6FDBEC) References: <48A5EC02.4070303@gmail.com> <20080817035921.4d35ae0e@mtlp.12thdimension> <1ba2fa240808170004p63b76db1l1fdfb1cf1cb41636@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1ba2fa240808170004p63b76db1l1fdfb1cf1cb41636@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote: > There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close > yet. There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and > are apparently wrong. Can you be more specific? Do you know which patches are wrong (even if you don't know how to fix them)? John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com