Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.190]:29041 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752970AbYISS1w (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:27:52 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so520454fkq.5 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:27:40 -0400 From: Celejar To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: "Larry Finger" , wireless , bcm43xx-dev , "Luis Rodriguez" Subject: Re: Can't connect to AP with hidden essid with 2.6.27-rc6 Message-Id: <20080919142740.60e2c0e8.celejar@gmail.com> (sfid-20080919_202755_966541_49674DAD) In-Reply-To: <43e72e890809191105p26841666l50a4a139a7177590@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080916220904.75283811.celejar@gmail.com> <48D06B9E.70307@lwfinger.net> <20080918004509.23a4bdc9.celejar@gmail.com> <48D1E42C.70904@lwfinger.net> <20080918015202.8c5f6381.celejar@gmail.com> <48D24911.80101@lwfinger.net> <20080918160957.94ea063d.celejar@gmail.com> <48D2D728.6070105@lwfinger.net> <20080919001050.d9ed273a.celejar@gmail.com> <48D3CFBC.6070504@lwfinger.net> <43e72e890809191105p26841666l50a4a139a7177590@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:05:35 -0700 "Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Larry Finger wrote: > > > I do not think a bisection is necessary. Your successful test of the > > old regulatory code suggests to me that there is some kind of problem > > with the CRDA database. > > BTW the "old regulatory code" is actually not "old regulatory code" > but instead static regulatory definitions slapped in the kernel just > as they were before but under the new regulatory infrastructure guise. > > > Luis - to fill you in, he can connect to an AP with a hidden essid > > using the old regulatory code, but not using CRDA. There seems to be > > some critical difference between them. > > Thanks for bringing this up Larry. > > If by old regulatory code you mean with CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY > then I would narrow the search down to testing as follows: > > --- Without crda: > > mv /sbin/crda /sbin/crda-foo > sudo rmmod your_driver mac80211 cfg80211 > sudo modprobe your_driver > > # Check channels using iw > > --- With crda: > mv /sbin/crda-foo /sbin/crda > sudo rmmod your_driver mac80211 cfg80211 > sudo modprobe your_driver > > # check channels using iw > --- > > By default when CONFIG_WIRELESS_OLD_REGULATORY is set the built-in > "US" static regulatory domain is used. If crda is present though a new > regulatory domain will be updated onto the kernel, so we'll get the > new regulatory domain built by crda from the original db.txt. Without > crda present the static regulatory domain shall be used. > > What frequency is the AP on? I (the user) am currently connecting successfully with CRDA to a hidden essid AP. I previously had claimed that it was still not working, even though the iw channel output looked good, but it currently seems to be okay. I may have previously done something wrong, such as not rebuilding CRDA for the current kernel, although in that case I'm not sure why the iw output would have been correct. In any event, at this point it seems that it may have been some mistake on my part. Thanks for the help, sorry for the noise, and I'll report back if I see any more trouble. > Luis Celejar -- mailmin.sourceforge.net - remote access via secure (OpenPGP) email ssuds.sourceforge.net - A Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator