Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.188]:62566 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752707AbYIZXab (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:30:31 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1117593fkq.5 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240809261630y7a8e5f20g75ab47ff98a1e614@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080927_013035_350046_CE636B11) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 02:30:29 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: bad DMAR interaction with iwlagn and SATA Cc: "Muli Ben-Yehuda" , "Jeff Garzik" , "Andres Freund" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless In-Reply-To: <1222441955.3798.13.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <200809251511.20132.andres@anarazel.de> <48DC44D4.8000103@garzik.org> <200809260419.07713.andres@anarazel.de> <48DC4BC0.7090203@garzik.org> <20080926144708.GD9118@il.ibm.com> <1222441955.3798.13.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 17:47 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > >> The way to debug this is to figure out why device 00:1f.2 is trying to >> read from DMA address fffbf000 and does not have permission to do >> so. This could be indicative of a driver bug where it is programming >> the device to read from some buffer that has not been allocated >> through the DMA API and thus does not have a valid IOMMU mapping, or a >> hardware quirk where the device tries to read from memory without host >> involvement. The former is much more likely. > > The same is probably true for the iwlagn case which was > >> [ 4184.617392] DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [03:00.0] fault addr fa946000 >> [ 4184.617393] DMAR:[fault reason 06] PTE Read access is not set >> [ 4184.644081] iwlagn: Microcode HW error detected. Restarting. > > and indeed matches experience from myself and Marcel that DMA bugs seem > to lurk. Meanwhile it all reported bugs in this case points to 64 bit installations, I'll give it more testing Thnaks. Tomas