Return-path: Received: from mail.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:46778 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428AbYIPJ0A (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2008 05:26:00 -0400 From: Helmut Schaa To: Holger Schurig Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: notify the user space about low signal quality Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:25:57 +0200 Cc: Kalle Valo , "Dan Williams" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org References: <200809151416.07552.hschaa@suse.de> <87fxo0zee1.fsf@nokia.com> <200809161050.41482.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> In-Reply-To: <200809161050.41482.hs4233@mail.mn-solutions.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200809161125.57593.hschaa@suse.de> (sfid-20080916_112605_438146_30F5536C) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Dienstag, 16. September 2008 10:50:41 schrieb Holger Schurig: > That would mean that you can use the Quality still for a > decision "Should I do a background scan or not?". But you cannot > use it for a decision "Should I switch to this AP or not?". Agreed. After the scan was triggered (based on whatever indicators) the decision is up to the supplicant once the scan results arrive. AFAIK it currently uses max_rate, signal_level and signal_quality (beside the security flags when multiple networks are defined). Helmut