Return-path: Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230]:24279 "EHLO mgw-mx03.nokia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752184AbYIPH6S (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:58:18 -0400 To: "Dan Williams" Cc: Helmut Schaa , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] mac80211: notify the user space about low signal quality References: <200809151416.07552.hschaa@suse.de> <200809151435.28933.hschaa@suse.de> <1221487652.10177.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200809151634.06448.hschaa@suse.de> <1221492529.10177.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> From: Kalle Valo Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:57:24 +0300 In-Reply-To: <1221492529.10177.76.camel@localhost.localdomain> (ext Dan Williams's message of "Mon\, 15 Sep 2008 11\:28\:49 -0400") Message-ID: <87zlm8zfob.fsf@nokia.com> (sfid-20080916_095821_986225_BA4A5C19) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dan Williams writes: > Thus something like what Holger suggests would be better from my > perspective than an ethereal concept like a "roaming threshold". > Maybe just a poor choice of terms? I'm sorry but I don't follow you. What ethereal concept are you talking about here? To me ethereal was just a sniffer. Does the word mean something else as well? -- Kalle Valo