Return-path: Received: from hostap.isc.org ([149.20.54.63]:42826 "EHLO hostap.isc.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753930AbYIHUHu (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 16:07:50 -0400 Message-ID: <48C5868B.8060103@w1.fi> (sfid-20080908_220754_668779_4FC63E7B) Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 23:09:47 +0300 From: Jouni Malinen MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johannes Berg CC: Tomas Winkler , Ron Rindjunsky , linux-wireless , j@w1.fi Subject: Re: HT action frame code References: <1220883730.31304.60.camel@johannes.berg> In-Reply-To: <1220883730.31304.60.camel@johannes.berg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg wrote: > When we're an AP, shouldn't we also in some way honour the block-ack > action frames? Or will that be done in hostapd, which then sets up > block-ack via some unspecified way? The current design assumes that hostapd takes care of all management frames, so eyes, these would need to go to hostapd for processing and then setup back to mac80211 through some new command.. - Jouni