Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:43916 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755655AbYIRUXY (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:23:24 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so324353fgg.17 for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1ba2fa240809181323n2fba2c93j7e884a437efbfe58@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080918_222327_335367_42F54397) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:23:22 +0300 From: "Tomas Winkler" To: "Gordon, Charles" Subject: Re: What is the state of 802.11h support? Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <8DCC153EAFE67A4B990A840E829F704B718874D96D@mtk-sms-exch01.digi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <8DCC153EAFE67A4B990A840E829F704B718874D96D@mtk-sms-exch01.digi.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Gordon, Charles wrote: > Can someone tell me how much of 802.11h is supported by Linux? What is the plan for completing it enough so that it implements a client which complies with the specification? > > What needs to be implemented in the wireless NIC driver to support 802.11h? My company is working on a wireless NIC driver for Linux. > What part of 11h are you looking for. We have pending implementation for everything that is under must requirement for BSS mode. Radar detection is not implemented. Tomas