Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.235]:45842 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752227AbYIZUZN (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:25:13 -0400 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so1198768rvb.1 for ; Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2da21fe50809261325o62dea98dyf40b06e373f29f53@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20080926_222518_815757_A63F1AF6) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 22:25:09 +0200 From: "Davide Pesavento" To: "Johannes Berg" Subject: Re: wireless-testing modpost failure Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, YanBo In-Reply-To: <1222457416.3798.25.camel@johannes.berg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 References: <2da21fe50809261104m3b7d99e3g8b56416b8182ca45@mail.gmail.com> <20080926190007.GD3483@tuxdriver.com> <1222457416.3798.25.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: 2008/9/26 Johannes Berg : > On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 15:00 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >> > Building modules, stage 2. >> > MODPOST 216 modules >> > ERROR: "mpp_path_lookup" [net/mac80211/mac80211.ko] undefined! >> > ERROR: "mpp_path_add" [net/mac80211/mac80211.ko] undefined! > > Davide, can you tell me what file/line it fails in? > How can I tell you that? >> I'm not sure what the best long-term solution is. Should we define >> empty versions of those functions when that config option is unset? >> Or just make the whole block subject to that config option? > > The weird thing is that the block in tx.c is already ifdef'ed out and > the block in rx.c should be optimised out entirely. > > johannes > Thanks, Davide