Return-path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:58610 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750870AbYIVHVx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Sep 2008 03:21:53 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d3so443284nfc.21 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:21:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: (sfid-20080922_092157_194738_26AD6C78) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 00:21:52 -0700 From: "Steven Noonan" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: ath9k problems Cc: "Howard Chu" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" In-Reply-To: <20080922064831.GB19580@tesla> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 References: <48D5CAD0.1080909@symas.com> <20080922064831.GB19580@tesla> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> but wireless-testing is pretty outdated > > This is not accurate. > > It lacks new patches from Linus' tree, but it has the latest > and greatest possible wireless patches. John maintains Linux > wireless so he'll always have more updated patches for wireless than > Linus. > I've had much less luck running wireless-testing than I have had running -tip or Linus' trees. Perhaps it -is- inaccurate that it's outdated, but it's certainly less usable, from what I've seen. - Steven